English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The art. 17, §1o of Act n.o 8.429/92, amended by Act n.o 13.964/19, began to admit conclusion of non-civil pursuit agreements in administrative misconduct actions, validating practice of Public Prosecutor's Office. When concluded during civil investigation, it may impose on the investigated the sanctions of Act, dispensing judicial approval. Thus, from a bibliographical research, using deductive method and theoretical framework the consensually and forms of control of Public Administration of Luciano Ferraz, it will be sought to demonstrate that there is no consensus in adjustments made in inquisitive phase, when dispensed the contradictory and the broad defense to the investigated.

O CONTROLE (NÃO)CONSENSUAL DOS ACORDOS FIRMADOS NA FASE INQUISITÓRIA E PREPARATÓRIA À AÇÃO DE IMPROBIDADE ADMINISTRATIVA