English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article aims to analyze the possible normative construction by Supreme Court when published the binding precedent n. 13, in 2008, which prohibits, in the different spheres of power, the nepotism. The objective is to analyze if the precedents considered as binding maintain a relation of content with the binding precedent and, if not, what are the limits and possibilities of the constitutional jurisdiction in the construction of binding legal notions, especially when accentuated by the implementation of the constitutional principles of administrative morality and impersonality.

revista de direito administrativo e gestão pública

ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA, JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL E VEDAÇÃO AO NEPOTISMO: A CONSTRUÇÃO NORMATIVA DO STF NA SÚMULA VINCULANTE N. 13 E A SALVAGUARDA DOS PRINCÍPIOS DA MORALIDADE E IMPESSOALIDADE ADMINISTRATIVA