English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This seeks to accomplish a critical analysis of the presidential veto of article 12B of PLC 07/2016, which would allow police officers to grant, on a temporarily basis, prior to judicial appreciation, protective measures of Law 11340/06, to women in situations of real risk of violence. It adopts the principle of primacy of the most favorable norm in order to ascertain its material [in]constitutionality. In the hiatus between judicial exclusiveness clause and the principle of women's human dignity, delay in granting protective measures to victims by the judiciary are not the exception, but the rule. Method used: Hypothetical-deductive; Methodology: bibliographical-documentary.

revista de criminologias e politicas criminais

“LEI DE PROTEÇÃO IMEDIATA À MULHER”: ANÁLISE CRÍTICA AO VETO DO ARTIGO 12-B DO PLC N° 07/2016 SOB A PERSPECTIVA DA APLICAÇÃO DO PRINCÍPIO DA PRIMAZIA DA NORMA MAIS FAVORÁVEL