English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article analysed the thesis number 210 of the Supreme Federal Court, whereby the Supreme Court ruled that, in international passenger transportation, compensation for baggage damage is limited to 1000 Special Drawing Rights, according to article 22, point 2 of the Warsaw-Montreal Convention. Using the inductive and dialectical methods, an incompatibility between the established thesis and the guarantee of full damage repair, consumer protection and the concept of efficiency of the Economic Analysis of Law was observed. Thus, such understanding is unconstitutional.

revista de direito, globalização e responsabilidade nas relações de consumo

A TESE 210 DA SUPREMA CORTE BRASILEIRA E A POSSÍVEL VIOLAÇÃO ÀS GARANTIAS CONSUMERISTAS: UMA ANÁLISE JURÍDICO ECONÔMICA DA PREVALÊNCIA DA CONVENÇÃO DE VARSÓVIA-MONTREAL.