English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This work seeks to demonstrate that criminal protection, by virtue of the principle of minimum intervention, is considered as ultima ratio, criminalizing conduct for the preservation of the most important legal assets of a society, safeguarding even industrial property (trademarks, patents, geographical indications and unfair competition). It was sought to study the circumstances regarding its (not)effectiveness. Notwithstanding the offenses set forth in Law no 9.279/1996, this essay aims to reflect on the pedagogical effects of criminal protection on industrial property. The research was carried out, regarding the approach, in a qualitative way, by bibliographic review, using the descriptive method. 1 Mestrando em Direito Público pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas UFAL. Pós-graduado em Formação para a Docência do Ensino Superior (CESMAC). Foi Diretor-Geral do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Alagoas, onde atua como Chefe de Gabinete. 2 Mestrando em Direito Público pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas UFAL. Pós-graduado em Direito Processual (CESMAC). Advogado. Professor Universitário. Procurador-Geral Adjunto do Município de Maceió/AL. Nigel Stewart Neves Patriota Malta & Márcio Roberto Torres Revista de Direito, Inovação, Propriedade Intelectual e Concorrência | e-ISSN: 2526-0014 | Brasília | v. 3 | n. 1 | p. 21 – 42 | Jan/Jun. 2017. 22

ENTRE O PRINCÍPIO DA INTERVENÇÃO MÍNIMA E A EXPANSÃO PENAL: A (IN)EFETIVIDADE DA PROTEÇÃO PENAL À PROPRIEDADE INDUSTRIAL