English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The US PTO issued, on August 30 th , 2016, Patent n. 9.430.468 for a Dutch corporation over a double blind electronic peer review system for academic journals. This patent raises great reaction among academics because such a patent ultimately means protecting an abstract idea that has been largely used by other software, including on line free software. This article analyzes the double blind peer review patent under a comparative perspective with US law, under the Nietzschean theory of justice as an exchange between the two parties. This article demonstrates that it is not the case of a patentable subject matter.

O Estranho Caso da Patente Americana n. 9.430.468 de Double Blind Peer Review de 30 de Agosto de 2016