English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present essay will analyze the interpretative biases of Law. To this end, it presents an approach on legal positivism, aiming to understand discretion as one of its elements and to present of concepts of jurisdiction and constitutionalism to positivity problems as a dangerous theory for the Democratic Rule of Law. Subsequently, it approaches a movement called linguistic turn to contextualiz the conceptions of law as an interpretative practice proposed by Ronald Dworkin and to start the discussion about the concept of verisimilitude as a finalistic object of the procedural narratives.

O PAPEL DA LITERATURA NO EXERCÍCIO DO DIREITO ENQUANTO PRÁTICA INTERPRETATIVA