English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study starts from the empowerment of the judge in the innumerable interpretative possibilities of the Constitution, analyzes public politics and precedents of the judiciary in the right to retirement. The theoretical framework is based on a Judiciary, replacing the public policies of the Executive and Legislative Power (BAUM, 1987) in the protection of social risks, which is done in a cautious analysis of the Constitution without causing major disruptions (BARAK, 2002; ARAÚJO, 2017). Methodologically focuses on the dynamics of social protection, constitutional interpretation, Citizenship Expedition Project, Resp. 1. 352.721 and Resp n.o. 1.649.636/MT. Judicial posture is increased by increasing the constitution by giving priority to social solidarity.

revista de direitos sociais, seguridade e previdência social

EMPODERAMENTO DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO NAS QUESTÕES AFETAS A SEGURIDADE SOCIAL: INCREMENTALISMO OU INTERPRETAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL EVOLUTIVA EM MATÉRIA PREVIDENCIÁRIA