English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article seeks, through jurimetry, to analyze decisions on strikes and its (non) abusiveness within the scope of the Regional Labor Court of the 4th Region. It makes a brief historical review of the consolidation of the strike as a right in Brazil, presents aspects of the doctrinal constructions around it and the jurisprudential treatment of its exercise, with the jurimetrical analysis of decisions and discussion of its results. It concludes that Constitutional Amendment 45/2004 is a turning point on the results of strike lawsuits and that the belief that the Labor Court tends to favor workers is not justified.

ANÁLISE JURIMÉTRICA DAS DECISÕES SOBRE A (NÃO) ABUSIVIDADE DE GREVES PELO TRIBUNAL REGIONAL DO TRABALHO DA 4ª REGIÃO