English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention.

A Modernização do Instituto da Arbitragem no Cenário Contemporâneo Sob A Ótica do novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro