English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Starting with a case study, the present article intends to look into the constitutionality of a legal norm by the introduction, by a Court with constitutional jurisdiction, of an exception clause to a fundamental right under the formula of a rule. Analysing the social and economic context of the trial (Covid-19 epidemy) and the judicial justification then presented as well, this article argues the non-aplicability of the fundamental right to the actual case at hand and the necessity of taking into effect a new balance of constitutional principles. Key-words: coronavirus; fundamental right; rules; principles; legal reasoning.

revista de teorias da justiça, da decisão e da argumentação jurídica

REFLEXÕES SOBRE O JULGAMENTO DA ADI 6363 OU SOBRE COMO O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL AFASTOU A APLICAÇÃO DE REGRAS CONSTITUCIONAIS SEM RASGAR A CONSTITUIÇÃO