English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present article aims to present and compare two different theories of justice, John Rawls’ theory of Justice as fairness, and Amartya Sen’s theory of justice focused on the achievements, in order to highlight their affinities and divergences. Initially, it is present the theory of Rawls, more specifically outlined in the book A Theory of Justice. Then, it is approach Sen's conception of achievement-centered social justice. And, finally, it is stand out from Sen's criticisms of Rawls in a comparative approach between theories.

JOHN RAWLS E AMARTYA SEN: PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DE JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE E A JUSTIÇA FOCADA NAS REALIZAÇÕES