English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper aims to problematize challenges which are inherent to empirical law research, based on an inductive research on the effectiveness of habeas corpus, which took place on judgments of the Criminal Chamber of the Sergipe State Court. Methodologically, the original research sought to break with the peer model in law, according to Epstein and King. Thus, this paper focuses on the methodological path outlined in the original research, in order to allow a reflection about “blind spots” to which every researcher should be alert in the search for valid findings on the judicial practice of the dogmatic institutes.

Desafios para a pesquisa empírica em direito: uma análise a partir de uma pesquisa indutiva sobre a prática judicial do habeas corpus