English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In Brazil historically, issues related to the constitution, human rights and legal pluralism are attached to the jurisdiction of the State. Such a model, though regarded as democratic, imposes official law with its ethnocentric burden on indigenous peoples. Thus, Brazil loses the opportunity to make the jurisdiction plural, with multicultural recognition. This essay aims to reflect on the challenges and possibilities of control to the indigenous jurisdiction in Brazil from the comparison with the Ecuadorian constitution, which assimilated the concept of indigenous jurisdiction from the New Latin American Constitutionalism. The methodology of the research is qualitative dialectic, with a bibliographical and documentary survey of data.

revista brasileira de teoria constitucional

CONSTITUIÇÃO, DIREITOS HUMANOS E PLURALISMO JURÍDICO: A POSSIBILIDADE DE CONTROLE À JURISDIÇÃO INDÍGENA NO BRASIL A PARTIR DA COMPARAÇÃO COM A CONSTITUIÇÃO EQUATORIANA.