English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article aims to evaluate the procedural jurisdictional model defended by Robert Alexy in his work “Fundamental Rights Theory”, determining the appropriateness points of it to the Brazilian case. Considering the activity of concretization and assurance of fundamental rights by the Constitution, dogmatic arguments had been raised in order to justify the necessity of a complementation in the procedural thesis within Brazilian social and juridical context. Thus, it had been questioned about the Judiciary Branch legitimacy in cases of procedural insufficiency and need of substantial complementation.

revista brasileira de teoria constitucional

DO PROCEDIMENTALISMO DE ALEXY À ABERTURA SUBSTANCIAL DA JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL: EM BUSCA DE UM MODELO ADEQUADO À CONCRETIZAÇÃO DOS DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS NO CONTEXTO BRASILEIRO.