English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study addresses the execution of the pre-sentencing prison sentence, examining HC 152.752, under Ronald Dworkin's theory of integrity that seeks to abolish the idea of a strong discretionary power of the judges, through the only possible correct answer. Some votes cast, however, demonstrate an excessive decisionism. The presumption of innocence is part of the sense of justice of the Brazilian, mistaking the STF in this case. Documentary and bibliographic sources were used. It is concluded that, according to Dworkin's theory, the only correct answer would be the prohibition of execution of the sentence before finality.

O DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À PRESUNÇÃO DE INOCÊNCIA, A TEORIA DA INTEGRIDADE DE RONALD DWORKIN E O JULGAMENTO DO HC 152.752 (CASO LULA)