English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article is to present Ronald Dworkin's position on the necessary connection between law and morality, as well as his construction that gives operational support to the idea that there are true moral answers. In addition, we intend to expose the position of the neuroscientist Sam Harris about the existence of moral truths, built in "The moral landscape." Thus, the intention is to demonstrate the approximations between the philosopher of law and the neuroscientist and, therefore, also between the philosophy of law and science, in a partial and limited way, concerning the existence of correct moral answers.

A tese das respostas morais corretas: quando o ouriço se encontra com a ciência. A aproximação entre os pensamentos de Ronald Dworkin e Sam Harris.