English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of the article is to analyze the question regarding the admissibility of illicit means of evidence in civil proceedings based on the 2015 Code paradigm, seeking to identify to what extent the normative diploma changed the dynamics of such institute. The descriptiveexploratory method was adopted through bibliographic review on the fundamental character of the right to the proof; the classic and contemporary trends on the concept and admissibility of illicit evidence and the proper reasoning for decisions on the matter, further investigating the contribution of the weighting technique brought by art.489, § 2 of CPC / 2015 to its implementation.

revista de direito brasileira

A ADMISSIBILIDADE DOS MEIOS DE PROVA ILÍCITOS NO PROCESSO CIVIL: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA CONFORMAÇÃO CONTEMPORÂNEA DOS PODERES INSTRUTÓRIOS DO JUIZ E DA TÉCNICA DE PONDERAÇÃO DO ART. 489, §1º DO CPC/2015