English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the application of legal rules and norms by the Brazilian Judiciary, a more objective action is now required, including through the use of computational logic methods, artificial interfaces and judicial precedents with mandatory application, which, given certain limits, can lead to injustice in specifics cases. In order to verify this hypothesis, the present article seeks to reflect on the performance of the Brazilian Judiciary in relation to the contemporary systematization of judicial process and new technologies, applying the constitutional rules and principles of human dignity, legality, publicity, efficiency, well such as proportionality and reasonableness, as concrete and prevalent procedural norms, even if the legal content is informed by indeterminate concepts or "according" to the historical path covered or to be followed. The research presented in this article uses the descriptive, qualitative, bibliographic and deductive methods. At the end, the conclusions will be presented with emphasis on the main aspects found throughout the research.

INTERFACES ARTIFICIAIS E INTERPRETAÇÃO JUDICIAL: O PROBLEMA DO USO DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E DA METODOLOGIA FUZZY NA APLICAÇÃO DO DIREITO