English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Considering the orientation of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court to accept, when the requirements are met, the beginning of the execution of sentence, in a closed or semi open regime, from the conviction in the second instance (STJ HC 126292, 17/02/2016), a decision such as this may violate the constitutional principle of presumption of innocence? In other words, is it guidance that can generally be applied to all cases? The purpose of this article is to analyze, with support in the sources of law, the normative basis that established the presumption of innocence as a fundamental human right, tracing a historical survey and conceptual aspects, without neglecting the importance of the applicability of this constitutional guarantee to society, starting with defending the legal guarantee of personal liberty. Finally, demonstrating the difficult path of international guarantees until the realization of the principle in dubio pro reo, at the national level. In view of this situation, using the hypothetico-deductive method, it is concluded by the exaggeration of this orientation in some situations, which is why it is necessary to analyze its application in each case. This article concludes by pointing out some important pointers for this analysis.

GARANTIA CONSTITUCIONAL DE PRESUNÇÃO DE INOCÊNCIA E A CONDENAÇÃO PENAL EM SEGUNDO GRAU