English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This work aims to examine the legitimacy of the decisions of equity in the arbitral proceeding. This because, allowing equity is used to support a decision, the recipients will not recognize _ as authors and therefore the decision is nothing more than a idiosyncratic vision of the judge regarding the dispute submitted to resolution. Thus, due process remain infringed and the decision, according to the democratic paradigm will not be legitimate. Through deductive method, will be demonstrating the illegitimacy of decisions of equity.

APONTAMENTOS SOBRE A ILEGITMIDADE DAS DECISÕES POR EQUIDADE NA ARBITRAGEM (ITEMS ON THE ILLEGITIMACY OF EQUITY DECISIONS IN ARBITRATION)