English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Summary. At the beginning of the XX century, within Ukraine, at the rural administrative-territorial level, a consolidated social movement was formed, consisting of mutually non-subordinated but mutually-functioning public associations. The article describes the classification schemes of public associations existing in national and foreign historiography. Each of them has advantages and disadvantages, but at the same time provides an optimal study of the history of statutory public sector. The combination of a number of such classifications helps a modern researcher to determine the role and place of public associations in the social life of Ukrainians. The content of the main typological approaches that were used to create the classifications of public associations of the Russian Empire from imperial times to the present is found. Attention is paid to the classification of V. Hessen, V. Czarnoluskii, O. Stepansky, T. Korzhikhina, O. Lyubushkina, A. Tumanova, V. Savchuk, I. Demus and many others. The multi-vector approaches, which are due to the application of various criteria and approaches from the constitutionallegal to the historical ones, is noted. It has been established that in modern historiography, despite the number of studies, objects of which were public associations, there is no single classification. Modern Ukrainian historians offer different types of classification of public associations in the late XIХ – early XX centuries. As empirical material to fill their systems they pay attention to city public associations. In aggregate, such works are an important factual gathering of only the city sector of the public statute initiative. Instead, in the historiographic space a lacuna was formed regarding to the public statute movement, which acted outside the city - in towns and villages. Based on the work of V. Savchuk, the criteria are proposed on the basis of which rural public associations should take their place in the classification schemes. The first criterion is the separation of rural public associations from a large array of statutory organizations according to the purpose. The second is the fixation of «village» public associations. The third is the generalization of the main types of rural community associations, which is realized as a result of analysis and comparison of the goals and objectives of the Society. The fourth one is the elaboration of rural associations based on the organizational and managerial principle. The importance and necessity of determining the place of rural public associations in the general network of public organizations as an integral part of it is emphasized.

Place of rural community associations of the late XIX – early XX century in modern classification systems