English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Main conceptual positions and methodological paradigms to problem imperial traditions and symbols of the nomadic society are considered in the article.The study of concrete historical events and processes associated with nomadic structures provides the ground for the formulation and analysis of conceptual, methodological problems.Reconstruction of the political-administrative and system-structural model of the Mongolian empire promotes a deepening of understanding of general trends and directions in studying the modern movement of historical knowledge in the issues of interconnection and interaction of the political and social system of nomadic societies. Modern historical science aims to conduct a systematic analysis of the Mongolian society proper, its social structure and social organization, the identification of the basic and significant prerequisites for the formation of the empire, the nature of its socio-political and administrative-managerial position.Mobility, the dynamism of political processes in nomadic societies led to instability and mobility of the whole structure, and cardinal changes led to the transformation of the whole system as a whole.

Imperial Traditions and Symbols of the Nomadic Society: The Modern Paradigm and Trends