English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The fallacy that a literary text has a unique and stable value has been contested for a long time. Therefore, if the reader is essential to creating the meaning of a text, his role is equally important to translation processes. Via Hans Robert Jauss’ Reception Theory (1994) and George Steiner’s concept of “dialectic reciprocity” (2005), this article aims to elucidate how the audience’s horizon of expectations of a translated text determines its translation methods as well as the survival of a literary text. The object of study will be two Brazilian translations (Marina Guaspari, 1949; Doris Goettems, 2011) of the play An Ideal Husband (1895), by Oscar Wilde.

A tradução condicionada pelo horizonte de expectativas: o caso da peça An Ideal Husband, de Oscar Wilde