English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Bu calismada demokrasi kuraminda cagdas yaklasimlar arasinda yer alan iki farkli dusunce uzerine odaklanilmistir. Hem Laclau ve Mouffe’un radikal demokrasi projesi hem de Hardt ve Negri’nin kuresel demokrasi dusuncesi, ozunde liberal demokrasinin gunumuzde karsilastigi krizine cozum olarak ortaya cikmistir. Her iki demokrasi projesinde de ozne, sinif, kimlik, hegemonya, azinlik, devrim kavramlari tartisilmaktadir. Bu cercevede bu calisma, Hardt ve Negri’nin cokluk ve imparatorluk kavramlariyla acikladigi kuresel demokrasi dusuncesinin radikal demokrasi elestirisi oldugunu iddia eder.

HARDT VE NEGRİ’NİN KÜRESEL DEMOKRASİ DÜŞÜNCESİ İLE LACLAU VE MOUFFE’UN RADİKAL DEMOKRASİ PROJESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZİ