English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

167 patients of cervical conization were performed for CINIII in a 34-month study. Conization include Cold-Knife Conization (CKC) (n=120) and hystoroscopy assisted non-suture cold-knife conization (HCKC) (n=47). Both groups were similar in terms of age, indications for conization, and size of cervical cone specimens. Comparing with CKC group, HCKC group was done in a significantly shorter time (28.52±9.80 minutes vs. 52.19±18.09 minutes) (P 0.05) , the recurrence rate (0% vs. 1%) (P&gt;0.05) and the postoperative complication (P&gt;0.05) between HCKC group and CKC group were not significant. The margins of the excision were checked by rapid histologic examination, showing the incidence of residual CIN was lower in HCKC group (8.51%) than in CKC group (9.17%) (P&gt;0.05). Our study indicates that HCKC is a better treatment than CKC in the management of patients with CINIII.

Hystoroscopy Assisted Non-Suture Cold-Knife Conization and Cold-Knife Conization in Patients with CINIII: A Comparative Study