English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

On the basis of previous research on the cultural action of the Chilean dictatorship (1973–1990), especially linked to the visual arts, this article reflects on some critical nodes in pursuit of an interpretive framework for that cultural action: identity and periodization, denomination, ideological affiliation, cultural reach of the rupture, comparison with South American dictatorships, manipulation of the media, and recognition of artistic and cultural action in relation to repressive identity. The article proposes the consideration of temporal, institutional, and content fluctuations in order to overcome dichotomous or absolute explanations that mythologize and obscure understanding of authoritarian cultural action and, therefore, of the dissident. Resumen A partir de investigaciones previas sobre la accion cultural de la dictadura chilena (1973–1990), especialmente vinculadas a las artes visuales, se reflexiona sobre nudos criticos claves en pos de un marco interpretativo sobre aquella: identidad y periodizacion, denominacion, filiacion ideologica, alcance cultural de la ruptura provocada, comparacion con las dictaduras sudamericanas, manipulacion de los medios y reconocimiento de la accion artistico-cultural con relacion a su identidad represiva. Se propone considerar las fluctuaciones temporales, institucionales y de contenido, para superar explicaciones dicotomicas o absolutas que mitifican y oscurecen la comprension del accionar cultural autoritario y, por ende, del disidente.

¿Cómo pensar la acción artístico-cultural de la dictadura chilena? Siete cuestiones para su interpretación