English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The purposes of this study were to determine the interrater reliability of the measurements of calcaneal inversion/eversion and subtalar joint neutral (STJN) in a patient population; to compare STJN using the mathematical and palpatory methods; and to compare the amount of calcaneal eversion in prone, bilateral stance, and unilateral stance. Three examiners measured 20 patients with recent ankle pathology according to a standardized protocol. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine interrater reliability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if a difference in motion existed between test positions. The results demonstrated that prone measurements of calcaneal inversion/eversion and STJN had low to moderate interrater reliability (ICC ranged from 0.25 to 0.60). Weight bearing measurements of calcaneal position demonstrated high interrater reliability (r = 0.91 in bilateral stance, r = 0.75 in unilateral stance). These findings suggest that nonweightbearing measurements may be of limited value in assessing subtalar joint range of motion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;12(1):10-15.

Interrater Reliability of Subtalar Neutral, Calcaneal Inversion and Eversion