English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Since its earliest days during the Nixon administration, environmental law has been built on federalism — on the notion that our nation’s shared air, water and ecosystems were best and most effectively protected by standards set on a national scale and enforced on more local levels. Yet that long-standing pattern has been turned on its head. The United States currently faces not just retreat, but outright hostility to environmental regulation on the federal level.  What will happen to environmental law now depends, in part, on the choices that America’s cities make about how to manage their environmental footprints, even in the absence of federal leadership. New York City's political leaders are rapidly positioning themselves to play a key role in in driving national and global action to combat climate change and environmental racism. Where the federal government has backed away, New York City has stepped forward. This paper will describe some of those efforts.

Protecting the Environment in an Era of Federal Retreat: The View from New York City