English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article deals with the legal meaning and position of the European Convention and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the implementation of decisions by national courts which are in legal force. Case-law of the Republic of Latvia Supreme Court and Supreme Court of the Republic of Finland shows that the European Convention refers to important legal instruments which must be taken into account when deciding on the case. Judicature of the Republic of Latvia Supreme Court shows that the European Convention refers to important legal instruments which must be taken into account when deciding on the case. When considering claims for cancellation of in force decisions on the basis of the ECHR Resolution on the recognition of a violation by Finland of articles of the Convention, the Court refers to numerous decisions of the European Court of affecting the interests of Finland and the other member states of the Convention, details examining and comparing the circumstances of each case. At the same time the final basis for a decision is based on the National Constitution of the Republic of Finland and Procedure.

Position of the European Court on the Implementation of Decisions by National Courts in Latvia and in Finland which are in Legal Force