English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Using a legal normative approach , it can be stated that Act no. 10 of 1998 (amending Act No. 7 of 1992 re. Banking), in the event Bank considers loans or other financial schemes application, they are under the obligation, in accordance with Art. 8 of Act  no. 10 of 1998, conduct a thorough analysis of the debtor’s good faith, financial ability and willingness, and on that basis determine the risk of non-payment. In short, implement due care principles. The elucidation of Art. 8 elaborated on the bank’s duties: to decide wisely with due care in order to minimize the risk of default, that is by evaluating debtor’s character, capital in his/her possession, collateral offered, and economical/financial condition.  In legal practice, however, it is possible for Banks to offer loans without collateral. In such case, only two articles of the Indonesian Civil Code (arts. 1131 and 1132) would be applicable to offer protection against possible default. This paper discusses the above legal discrepancy in light of the role and function of collateral as protection against non-payment.

THE LEGAL ASPECT OF CREDIT WITHOUT COLLATERAL IN INDONESIA (ASPEK HUKUM KREDIT TANPA AGUNAN DI INDONESIA)