English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Rock permeability is an important rock characteristic because it can help determine the rate of fluid production. Permeability can only be determined by direct measurement of core samples in the laboratory. Even though coring gives good results, the disadvantage is that it takes a lot of time and costs so it is not possible to do coring at all intervals. So that the well log is required to predict the level of permeability indirectly. However, the calculation of permeability prediction using well log data has a high uncertainty value, so rock typing is required so that the calculation of permeability prediction becomes more detailed. This research was conducted in an effort to determine the Hydraulic Flow Unit (HFU) of the reservoir in the well that has core data using the Flow Zone Indicator (FZI) parameter and FZI value propagation on wells that do not have core data so that the type of rock and permeability value are obtained from every well interval. From the results of the study, the reservoirs on the ASR field can be grouped into six rock types. The six rock types each have permeability as a function of validated porosity by applying it at all intervals. After FZI is calculated from log data and validated with core data, it can be seen that the results of the method produce a fairly good correlation (R 2 = 0.92). Furthermore, from the permeability equation values for each different rock type, the predicted permeability results are also quite good (R 2 = 0.81).

Comparison of Rock Type Determination Based on Permeability Estimation and FZI Value in Upper Cibulakan Shaly Sand Formation, ASR Field