English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Plato offers two criticisms of imitative poetry in the Republic. In the firstone, developed in books II and III, Plato seems to criticize poetry softly,banning only one part of imitative poetry. The second criticism, developedin book x, seems to establish a more drastic critique to imitative poetry thatprecludes the possibility of any kind of imitative poetry in the polis. Manydifferent interpretations have been proposed in order to account for thisapparent clash. I will defend Tate’s classical interpretation, according towhich no clash exists because Plato distinguishes two kinds of imitations,and he remains consistent in preserving one and banishing the other.

Plato on the Political Role of Poetry: the Expulsion of the Traditional Poets and the Reform of Poetry