English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article shows the problem which represents the effective reparation for the internal armed conflict victims, the legalistic contradiction in which legitimacy is part of the Law of Victims and Land Restitution as a component of the regulatory system of transitional justice in Colombia, which favors a positivist conception that exhales the belief in the legality of the procedures above ontological conception of legitimacy that recognizes the power of judgment instituting the victims of the civil war in Colombia. This will become an apparent contradiction contrasting the positive Weberian legitimacy position to the principle of legitimacy, which postulates Carl Friedrich and communication principle formulated by Jurgen Habermas for normative validity, trying to offer a way out of this impasse from conception faculty of judgment posed in his law of truth Jacques Poulain

LEGITIMIDAD FUERA DEL PODER INSTITUYENTE: LÍMITES DE LA VALIDEZ EN LA LEY DE VÍCTIMAS Y RESTITUCIÓN DE TIERRAS