English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article proposes to deconstruct some ideas (often presupposed) in populism studies, according to which: (1) studying leaders is synonymous with studying movements; (2) that it is only pertinent to compare homologous cases; (3) that populisms are characterized by direct communication which necessarily involves three participants, the leader, the people and their enemies; (4) and that populisms tend to homogenize political identities. Contrary to these premises this article intends to examine two dissimilar populist experiences, the first Peronism in Argentina and Gaitanism in Colombia, understanding populisms as discourses characterized by constructing contingent and constitutively heterogeneous political identifications. For this purpose, identification processes of two mediating and especially controversial figures during the process of emergence of Peronism and Gaitanism are analyzed: Cipriano Reyes and J. A. Osorio Lizarazo, respectively.

Populismos y procesos identificatorios: un contrapunto entre dos figuras mediadoras del Peronismo en Argentina y el Gaitanismo en Colombia