English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. However, judicial accountability is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. That is why, the international and some regional communities have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability, judicial, court, judge, international law.

Judicial Accoutability - International Standards and Experiences of some Countries in the Wolrd