English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Changes to Canada’s immigration and refugee determination policies made since 2012 have increased the occurrence and persistence of temporariness in Canada, contributing to the systematic exclusion of a growing number of non-citizens, who live and work on the territory, from a wide range of rights. From the perspective of temporariness, I illustrate the striking similarities in the state’s approach to two seemingly distinct groups of non-citizens (based on their rationale for admission): low-skilled temporary foreign workers and refugee claimants. Both groups occupy a low rung in the hierarchy of rights and entitlements to citizenship in Canada, inevitably affecting their social and economic outcomes in the host society. In conclusion, I argue that there is still much to be gained by viewing these distinct groups of temporary migrants as theoretically and experientially linked, in order to design effective policy and deter Canada from repeating its dark and exclusionary migratory past. Les changements aux politiques canadiennes d’immigration et d’admission au statut de refugie depuis 2012 ont augmente le caractere temporaire des sejours au Canada, contribuant ainsi a l’exclusion systematique d’acces d’un nombre croissant d’etrangers vivant et travaillant sur le territoire canadien a une variete de droits. Du point de vue de la precarite, cet article montre les ressemblances importantes dans la facon que sont consideres deux groupes distincts d’etrangers du point de leur admission : les travailleurs etrangers non qualifies, et les demandeurs d’asile. Ces deux groupes occupent des places inferieures dans la hierarchie des droits et de l’acces a la citoyennete canadienne, ce qui affecte invariablement leur place sociale et economique dans la societe. En conclusion, on avance qu’il y a beaucoup d’avantages a considerer ensemble, sur les plans theoriques et pratiques, ces deux groupes de migrants temporaires, afin de concevoir des politiques plus efficaces et d’eviter que le Canada repete les erreurs de sa triste et discriminatoire histoire en matiere de migration.

Temporariness, Rights, and Citizenship: The Latest Chapter in Canada’s Exclusionary Migration and Refugee History