English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Canadian women's history, though relatively new in the history of the profession, is now considered by some to be passt, past its prime, out of touch with the realities of the postmodern world of the 1990s. In fact, there is also a new interpretation of the historical evolution of Canadian women's history emerging, which situates women's history in the one dimensional past, gender history in the three dimensional future. This is the way the story goes. First, there was old-fashioned history, in which political, military and economic themes relating to men and the public sphere dominated. Then, in the 1970s, a challenge to that history came from a group of younger and junior members of the profession, feminists who wished to re-establish women's place in history by recovering, analyzing and understanding women's past, which, the story concedes, had been marginalized and trivialized in the reigning historical interpretations. Although these early feminists were correct in seeing a masculine bias in history, the narrative continues, they were still limited in their outlook, and their writing was problematic for a number of reasons. They produced a history which was "compensatory", and like the older male-dominated history, represented only one piece of a more complex jigsaw puzzle. They simply "added" women to the existing historical stew and "stirred, without really questioning all the ingredients of history.' They still took men as the measure, concentrating on women, and especially WASP women, in the public sphere. Moreover, they "limited" themselves to descriptions of women's "experiences" rather than analyzing "shifts in the relations between

Beyond Dichotomies: Re-Assessing Gender History and Women's History in Canada