English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Article history: Received: 27 January, 2020 Accepted: 22 February, 2020 Online: 04 April, 2020 Limited functionalities of the Academic Progress Information System (SIsKA) has direct consequences on the quality of thesis management service at the authors’ magister study program of the authors’ university. This research focused on the significant improvement from the previous User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) result of SIsKA. That significant improvement was based on the recommendations from the previous Heuristic Evaluation (HE) and two additional usability evaluation methods. All of those improvements have been applied to the new Academic Progress Information System that was called SIsKA Next Generation (SIsKA-NG). Overall, there are three usability evaluation methods were used in this research, namely the Performance Measurement (PM), the Retrospective Think Aloud (RTA), and the UEQ. The PM through the effectiveness analysis and the efficiency analysis each provided 11 and 16 recommendations, while The RTA provided 39 recommendations. The UEQ provided the assessment on SIsKA-NG with level excellent on aspect of attractiveness, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty; and with level good on aspect of perspicuity. It was considered as a significant improvement of the UEQ result of SIsKA-NG compared to the previous UEQ result of SIsKA because of the better assessment on four aspects with level excellent on SIsKA-NG, namely attractiveness, efficiency, dependability, and novelty. Same assessments are on two aspects, namely perspicuity and stimulation. SIsKA-NG still need to be improved based on the aspect of perspicuity, additional recommendations from the conducted Focus Group Discussion, and procedural White Box testing for code evaluation.

The Usability Evaluation of Academic Progress Information System (SIsKA-NG)