English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is time for citizen participation. Local governments are committed to the promotion of participatory processes in response to the demands of social and neighborhood groups, who demand channels to influence the decision making process. Some claims that in some cases, local governments have channeled through processes of decentralization using the neighborhood or district as an area of participation. In this context, our main objective to analyze the results of these processes in the five boroughs, displaying the possibilities and obstacles in the definition of the three models we have created: traditional and institutional, deliberative, and innovative institutional and institutional. The results are clear. In all three models are displayed realities common obstacles to enhance the plurality of discourses about the difficulty of integrating the excluded sectors of society in these processes. In turn, show deficiencies in the quality of the deliberation of decision-making process and finally, the results tend to respond to public policies, low profile with little citizen involvement.

La descentralización y la participación ciudadana a debate: Un escenario de futuro complejo