English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The assessment of terminal ballistic performance has historically been strongly biased toward the penetration resistance of the target architecture and its component materials. However, penetration modeling alone does not provide sufficient knowledge to create new and/or improved armor ceramics materials capable of mitigating and preventing penetration. It is apparent that physical impact damage occurs prior to, and strongly affects, the occurrence and progress of the penetration process and as such impact damage needs to be explicitly included in ballistic performance modeling. One aspect of this situation has been the difficulty in attaining a detailed volumetric characterization of actual subsurface bulk impact damage. The x-ray computed tomography (XCT), diagnostic and 3D visualization techniques presently appear as the only effective nondestructive evaluation (NDE), modality for high resolution volumetric impact damage interrogation, spatial characterization, quantification, visualization, and 3D analysis. An overview of the current XCT impact damage diagnostic capabilities and results are discussed along with some remaining challenges and the need to incorporate 3D physical damage features into future computational

On the linkage of impact damage to modeling of ballistic performance