English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

CEAB 2014 requires the appraisal of ‘attributes’. Quasi-competencies are not easy to ‘measure’. Results risk having a ‘local’ meaning with little transferability between institutions. From its interest into CDIO, and in parallel to its partaking in the DOCET project, Ecole Polytechnique developed a 7-level scale, fieldtested by nearly 100 appraisals pre-graduation work experiences. The paper summarizes the rationale behind the 7-level scale when compared to the 5-level CDIO scale, the possible mapping onto the EQF, and reports on the appraisals of students after 16 weeks internships. Supervisors appear to use the tool as a relative Likert-type scale, and will have to undergo a learning curve. Attributes appraisal tools need to be engineered rather than to be determined by consensus.

Towards a scale and tool for the appraisal of CEAB attributes - Progress report on a field test