English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Psalms 16, 22, and 110. Historically Interpreted as Referring to Jesus Three Christological Psalms, 16, 22, and 110 are troublesome to modern interpretersas they are used by New Testament writers. Scholars in earlier centuries had little difficultyfollowing the ways these psalms seemed to be counted in the New Testament as predictionsof Jesus. This interpretation was continued in the Reformation but is strongly questionedby conservative and critical scholars today. The argument reviews the contextual commentaryfor important quotations of these psalms in the New Testament, and examines the special contentof the psalms to conclude that the earlier interpreters are more trustworthy guides. Theunusual New Testament usage and strange content of the psalms warrants the application ofexceptional hermeneutical principles to read them properly in the biblical canon. The implicationsfor a Christological reading of these psalms are explored for theological and practical value.