English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Namen dela: Z raziskavo smo želeli ugotoviti, kakšno mnenje o vplivu in pomembnosti posameznih ukrepov alkoholne politike pri zmanjševanju škodljivih posledic zaradi alkohola imajo različni akterji alkoholne politike v Sloveniji, in prepoznati njihove interese. Osnovne metode: Izvedli smo kvantitativno raziskavo, in sicer z vprašalnikom, ki je vseboval 25 trditev v okviru 9 področij alkoholne politike. Vprašalnik smo poslali 320 akterjem alkoholne politike v Sloveniji, razdeljenim v 4 glavne skupine: vladne organizacije, javnozdravstvene organizacije, nevladne organizacije ter alkoholna industrija. Zbrane podatke smo obdelali s programom SPSS. Razlike v pogledih na posamezno področje alkoholne politike med različnimi akterji smo ugotavljali s testom ANOVA in t-testom. Glavni izsledki: Faktorska analiza mnenj posameznih akterjev alkoholne politike v Sloveniji je razkrila tri glavne dejavnike: izobraževanje in ozaveščanje, regulacijske ukrepe in cenovneukrepe. Vsi akterji so kot najpomembnejše ukrepe in ukrepe z največjim učinkom izpostavili ukrepe, povezane z izobraževanjem, komuniciranjem in ozaveščanjem. Ukrepe s področja regulative alkoholna industrija zaznava kot občutno manj pomembne in z manjšim vplivom na zmanjševanje škodljivih posledic alkohola kot ostali akterji. Enako je z oceno ukrepov s področja cenovne politike. Poglavitni sklepi: Tako kot podobna raziskava o razumevanju alkoholne politike na evropski ravni tudi z našo ugotavljamo, da posamezne akterje alkoholne politike vodijo različni interesi v povezavi s posameznimi ukrepi alkoholne politike, vendar pa v Sloveniji te razlike niso tako izrazite kot na evropski ravni.Čeprav imajo akterji različne poglede in interese glede alkoholne politike in njenih posameznih ukrepov, smo z raziskavo prepoznali tista področja, na katerih lahko akterji sodelujejo pri pripravi boljših in učinkovitejših ukrepov alkoholne politike za preventivo škodljivih učinkov alkohola v Sloveniji.Aims: The purpose of the study was to determine how the stakeholders involved in alcohol policy in Slovenia view the importance and impact of alcohol policymeasures in alcohol-related harm reduction, and to identify their interests. Methods: The questionnaire comprising 25 statements across nine alcohol policy domains was sent to 320 stakeholders involved in alcohol policyin Slovenia. They were divided into the following four main groups: governmental organisations, public health organisations, non-governmental organisations and alcohol industry. The data collected were analysed using the SPSS programme. Differences between the groups concerning their views on individual alcohol policy interventions were measured using the ANOVA and T-test. Results: Factor analysis of stakeholders\u27 views identified three main alcohol policy platforms: education, regulation and pricing. All the participating stakeholders emphasized education, communication, training and raising public awareness as the most important activities that had the greatest impact on the reduction of alcohol-related harm. Governmental and non-governmental organisations and public health institutions assigned significantly higher scores to the impact of regulatory alcohol policy measures and to the importance of regulatory policies on reducing alcohol-related harm than the alcohol industry. The alcohol industry perceived the pricing measures taken to reduce harm done by alcohol as having a significantly lower impact and lesser importance than did the group of otherstakeholders. Conclusions: Like similar studies of attitudes towards alcohol policy in Europe, our research showed that different stakeholders are guided by different interests in relation to particular alcohol policy measureshowever, these differences were lesser than those identified at the EU level. In spite of stakeholders\u27 different interests and views concerning particular alcohol strategies and alcohol policy in general, we have identified common grounds for them to work together to prepare better and more effective measures of alcohol-related harm prevention in Slovenia

Stakeholders' interests through their opinions on the alcohol policy measures in Slovenia