English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This comparative case study explores the formal and informal principles governing electionformats produced by the public service broadcasters in Sweden, Denmark and Norway.The focus is on external regulation vs. journalistic autonomy and on principles of balanceand access. The conclusion is that the Scandinavian broadcasters, to a larger extent thanbroadcasters in other Western countries, independently control the form and content of theirelection formats. This journalistic autonomy, however, has brought about election formatsgoverned by different principles of access. The Danish and Swedish formats are based ona moderate stopwatch logic, whereas the election formats in Norway center on criteria ofaudience appeal, resulting in a model of access disproportionately favoring certain politicalparties. The high degree of journalistic control of election formats in Scandinavia, pairedwith the low control of political parties encourage a discussion of some of the centralpremises in the Democratic Corporatist Model

The Autonomy of Scandinavian Public Service Broadcasters During Election Campaign Periods