English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Low-glycemic index carbohydrates are potentially better for endurance performance as they result in greater fat oxidation and lower carbohydrate oxidation due to lower insulin release. We compared the effects of pre-exercise feeding with a low-glycemic index lentil-based sports nutrition bar, a commercially-available sports nutrition bar with moderate-glycemic index, and a non-caloric placebo on metabolism and performance during endurance cycling (Trial 1). Using a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, endurance-trained individuals (n = 11; eight males; 26 ± 6y; VO2peak 51.4 ± 1.6 mL/kg/min) consumed 1.5 g/kg available carbohydrate from a lentil bar and a moderate-glycemic index bar, as well as a placebo, 1h before endurance cycling (75 min at 65% VO2peak, followed by a 7 km time trial). We also compared post-exercise consumption of the low-glycemic index bar with another moderate-glycemic index bar on next-day exercise performance as an assessment of recovery (Trial 2). In Trial 1, fat or carbohydrate oxidation rates were not different between the bar conditions (p &gt; 0.05). Blood lactate was lower during the low- versus the moderate-glycemic index condition after 75 minutes of cycling (2.6 versus 4.0 mmol/L, p &lt; 0.05) and at the end of the time trial (7.4 versus 9.1 mmol/L, p &lt; 0.05). Time trial performance improved (p &lt; 0.05) after consumption of the low- (574 ± 55 s) and moderate-glycemic index (583 ± 59 s) bars compared to the placebo (619 ± 81 s). In Trial 2 (next-day recovery), performance improved (p &lt; 0.05) with the low-glycemic index bar (547 ± 42 s) compared to the moderate-glycemic index bar (569 ± 42 s) and the placebo (566 ± 34 s). Low- and moderate-glycemic index sports nutrition bars improved cycling exercise performance; however, only the low-glycemic index bar improved next day performance.

The Glycemic Index of Sport Nutrition Bars Affects Performance and Metabolism During Cycling and Next‐Day Recovery