English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We compared 3 Tesla (3T) compressed sensing (CS)-MRI of different pulse sequences with various acceleration factors to standard fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences in terms of time, quality, and inter-reader agreement. Each sequence was qualitatively ranked and then qualitatively scored for blurring, artifact, low contrast detection, noise pattern, signal-to-noise ratio, and overall quality. The CS-MRI sequences demonstrated very good overall quality compared with routine FSE sequences with overall good inter-reader agreement.

Compressed Sensing MR Imaging (CS-MRI) of the Knee: Assessment of Quality, Inter-reader Agreement, and Acquisition Time