English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We compared peak circumferential strain (Ecc) values with spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM) and strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 3 tesla. Correlation coefficients of the averaged peak Ecc values of the 2 methods were statistically significant. However, the average peak Ecc value was significantly lower with SPAMM (-13.5%±3.3%) than with SENC (-21.6%±3.4%) (P&lt;0.0001). The SENC method showed higher circumferential strain than the SPAMM method at 3T.

Comparison of SPAMM and SENC Methods for Evaluating Peak Circumferential Strain at 3T