English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Several authors have highlighted the close affinity between Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptions and those of American pragmatism, in particular on the analysis of habit. Emmanuel Bourdieu compared his father’s dispositionalism with Charles S. Peirce’s. I will focus on a different pragmatist author, namely John Dewey, who is an “actualist” – as opposed to a dispositionalist. There are many similarities between Bourdieu’s concept of habitus and Dewey’s concept of habit. Yet there are also important differences I would like to emphasize.

Bourdieu y el pragmatismo norteamericano acerca de la creatividad del hábito