English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Within the field of social sciences, medicalization as a concept is a regular matter of cultural social, economic and political-legislative agenda. It is also convening in academicals, research, clinical and professional spaces, in which some inaccuracies related to the concept and its circulation, became evident. These inaccuracies can be resumed in three lines: the adjectivally use of the concept, the reduction of the concept and the inappropriateness of the concept. This paper’s objective is to present some theoretical and methodological implications and corollaries which are derived from the inaccuracies mentioned above. In order to do so, some analytical and interpretative methods on specific national and international bibliography are used, with ADHD as an empirical example.

¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de medicalización? Sobre adjetivaciones, reduccionismos y falacias del concepto en ciencias sociales